LB v Lattimore [2010] NSWADT 122
The Tribunal does not have jurisdiction because the applicant's complaint was not the subject of a report by the Privacy Commissioner under section 47 of the Health Records and Information Privacy Act 2002.
- Parties
- Applicant: LB; Respondent: Dr Glenda Lattimore
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 26 May 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Original Application / Jurisdiction Determination
- Outcome
- Application dismissed for want of jurisdiction
- Legal Topics
- Health Privacy Principles, Jurisdiction, Private Sector Persons
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Parties
LB
Applicant
Dr Glenda Lattimore
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Original Application / Jurisdiction Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Tribunal has jurisdiction to hear and determine the applicant's complaint under section 48(1) of the Health Records and Information Privacy Act 2002
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal does not have jurisdiction because the applicant's complaint was not the subject of a report by the Privacy Commissioner under section 47 of the Health Records and Information Privacy Act 2002.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed for want of jurisdiction
Orders
- The Tribunal does not have jurisdiction to hear and determine this application.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment