Environment Protection Authority v Le Dome Pty Limited [2002] NSWLEC 167
Conviction is appropriate as the offence cannot be regarded as trivial within the statutory framework, and the defendant's culpability includes inadequate notice and compliance systems, despite mitigating factors. A fine reflecting 10% of the maximum penalty is just and appropriate when allowing a 50% discount for mitigation.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 September 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Prosecution / Sentence and Penalty After a Guilty Plea
- Outcome
- Conviction; fine; costs order
- Legal Topics
- ['use of Pesticides' 'vicarious Liability' 'sentencing – Mitigating Circumstances' 'breach of Label Instructions for Hazardous Substances']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Prosecution / Sentence and Penalty After a Guilty Plea
Legal Issues
- 1 ['What is the appropriate sentence for a corporation that used a registered pesticide contrary to the approved label, through the acts of its employee?' 'Does the nature and circumstances of the offence, with mitigating factors, justify a conviction or sentence without conviction under Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 s 10?']
Ratio Decidendi
Conviction is appropriate as the offence cannot be regarded as trivial within the statutory framework, and the defendant's culpability includes inadequate notice and compliance systems, despite mitigating factors. A fine reflecting 10% of the maximum penalty is just and appropriate when allowing a 50% discount for mitigation.
Court Disposition
Conviction; fine; costs order
Orders
- ['The Defendant is convicted of the offence charged.' 'A penalty of $12,000 is imposed.' "The Defendant shall pay the Prosecutor's reasonable legal costs in the sum agreed of $10,000." 'Exhibits to remain on the Court file.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment