Regina v Le, Quang [1999] NSWDRGC 11

Regina v Le, Quang [1999] NSWDRGC 11

The Court declined to proceed to convict and sentence the defendant under section 7(2) of the Drug Court Act 1998 (NSW). Cancellation of the periodic detention order could not be treated as a conviction and sentence for an offence, and the proposed setting of a nominal minimum term with the whole unexpired portion as an additional term was not justified because participation in a Drug Court program was not a special circumstance of the kind contemplated by section 5(2) of the Sentencing Act 1989 (NSW).

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
24 February 1999
Procedural Posture
Drug Court Referral Concerning Whether to Proceed to Convict and Sentence Under Section 7(2) of the Drug Court Act 1998 (nsw) / Determination of Discretionary Issue Before Conviction and Sentence, in Circumstances Where the Defendant Faced Cancellation of a Periodic Detention Order
Outcome
The Court declined to convict and sentence the defendant under section 7(2) of the Drug Court Act 1998 (NSW).
Legal Topics
['discretion Under Drug Court Act 1998 (nsw)' 'cancellation of Periodic Detention Order' 'minimum and Additional Terms' 'special Circumstances']
['criminal Law' 'sentencing' 'drug Court'] ['discretion Under Drug Court Act 1998 (nsw)' 'cancellation of Periodic Detention Order' 'minimum and Additional Terms' 'special Circumstances']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Drug Court Referral Concerning Whether to Proceed to Convict and Sentence Under Section 7(2) of the Drug Court Act 1998 (nsw) / Determination of Discretionary Issue Before Conviction and Sentence, in Circumstances Where the Defendant Faced Cancellation of a Periodic Detention Order

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the Court should exercise its discretion under section 7(2) of the Drug Court Act 1998 (NSW) to convict and sentence the defendant for the offences for which he had been referred to the Court.' 'Whether cancellation of a periodic detention order could be treated as a conviction and sentence for an offence under sections 7(2) or 7(4) of the Drug Court Act 1998 (NSW).' 'Whether the Court should exercise the criminal jurisdiction of the Local Court under section 24(1)(b) of the Drug Court Act 1998 (NSW) and set nominal minimum and lengthy additional terms under section 27(4) of the Periodic Detention of Prisoners Act 1981 (NSW).' 'Whether the prospect of participation in a Drug Court program amounted to special circumstances under section 5(2) of the Sentencing Act 1989 (NSW).']

Ratio Decidendi

The Court declined to proceed to convict and sentence the defendant under section 7(2) of the Drug Court Act 1998 (NSW). Cancellation of the periodic detention order could not be treated as a conviction and sentence for an offence, and the proposed setting of a nominal minimum term with the whole unexpired portion as an additional term was not justified because participation in a Drug Court program was not a special circumstance of the kind contemplated by section 5(2) of the Sentencing Act 1989 (NSW).

Court Disposition

The Court declined to convict and sentence the defendant under section 7(2) of the Drug Court Act 1998 (NSW).

Orders

  • ['The Court declined to convict and sentence the defendant under section 7(2) of the Drug Court Act 1998 (NSW).']