Leading Age Services Australia NSW-ACT [2016] NSWIC 7
Invalidities in the alteration of rule 29 and subsequent management and appointments occurred due to non-compliance with s 242(2) and lack of Registrar's consent under s 245. The acts, appointments, and decisions during the invalid period are validated, but validating the amended rule itself would perpetuate breach of s 242(2), so the rule must be amended for compliance. Orders were made because there would be no substantial injustice to the applicant, its members, creditors, or other stakeholders.
- Parties
- Applicant: Leading Age Services Australia NSW-ACT
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 01 July 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Determination of Invalidity and Validation Orders for a Registered Organisation / Final Determination and Orders After Hearing
- Outcome
- Orders made declaring invalidities in rule alteration and management; validation of certain acts, appointments and committee decisions; direction to amend rule 29 to comply with s 242(2).
- Legal Topics
- Registered Organisations, Rule Changes, Validation of Acts, Invalidity in Management or Administration, Industrial Relations Act 1996 (nsw) S 288, Filling of Casual Vacancies, Election and Appointment in Registered Organisations
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Leading Age Services Australia NSW-ACT
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Application for Determination of Invalidity and Validation Orders for a Registered Organisation / Final Determination and Orders After Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether invalidities occurred in the alteration of rules of a registered organisation under s 288(1) of the Industrial Relations Act 1996 (NSW)
- 2 Whether invalidities occurred in the management or administration and appointment in the organisation
- 3 Whether orders for validation of acts and appointments are appropriate under s 288(3)
Ratio Decidendi
Invalidities in the alteration of rule 29 and subsequent management and appointments occurred due to non-compliance with s 242(2) and lack of Registrar's consent under s 245. The acts, appointments, and decisions during the invalid period are validated, but validating the amended rule itself would perpetuate breach of s 242(2), so the rule must be amended for compliance. Orders were made because there would be no substantial injustice to the applicant, its members, creditors, or other stakeholders.
Court Disposition
Orders made declaring invalidities in rule alteration and management; validation of certain acts, appointments and committee decisions; direction to amend rule 29 to comply with s 242(2).
Orders
- Declaration of invalidity in alteration of rule 29 and lack of consent from the Industrial Registrar.
- Declaration of invalidity in management/administration for persons holding office after February 2015.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment