Petersen v Gregory; Estate Glen Alfred Petersen [2007] NSWSC 8
At the date of death, Ms Gregory and the deceased did not live together as a couple or share a romantic relationship or mutual commitment transcending mere residential cohabitation. Ms Gregory was not the de facto spouse for the purposes of intestate succession under s.61B of the Wills, Probate and Administration Act 1898.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 29 January 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Probate Proceedings (intestate Estate) / Judgment After Hearing
- Outcome
- Letters of administration to be granted to deceased's father (Mr Petersen). Ms Gregory's claim as de facto spouse fails. Costs reserved.
- Legal Topics
- ['intestate Succession' 'de Facto Spouse' 'letters of Administration' 'de Facto Relationship Definition']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Probate Proceedings (intestate Estate) / Judgment After Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether Ms Gregory was the de facto spouse of the deceased at the time of death for purposes of intestate succession under the Wills, Probate and Administration Act 1898']
Ratio Decidendi
At the date of death, Ms Gregory and the deceased did not live together as a couple or share a romantic relationship or mutual commitment transcending mere residential cohabitation. Ms Gregory was not the de facto spouse for the purposes of intestate succession under s.61B of the Wills, Probate and Administration Act 1898.
Court Disposition
Letters of administration to be granted to deceased's father (Mr Petersen). Ms Gregory's claim as de facto spouse fails. Costs reserved.
Orders
- ['Grant of letters of administration to George Petersen as surviving parent.' "Ms Gregory's claim to be de facto spouse refused." 'Directions for costs submissions: If Ms Gregory seeks a different costs order, written submissions to be filed within fourteen days; Mr Petersen to respond within a further fourteen days.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment