Towne v Prospect County Council [2000] NSWCA 270
The trial judge's award of $13,950 interest on past Griffiths v Kerkemeyer damages was a slip because it represented 6.2 per cent of $225,000 for one year when the relevant period was 10 years. The trial judge had assessed past voluntary services as accruing over the 10 year period using a rough weekly amount, thereby taking the first approach in Marsland v Andjelic (No 2), under which interest was payable. The appeal therefore succeeded and the cross-appeal failed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 29 September 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal and Cross Appeal in Damages Proceedings for Nervous Shock / New South Wales Court of Appeal From District Court Verdict and Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; cross-appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['griffiths V Kerkemeyer Damages' 'interest on Past Damages' 'nervous Shock' 'slip in Calculation of Interest']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal and Cross Appeal in Damages Proceedings for Nervous Shock / New South Wales Court of Appeal From District Court Verdict and Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the trial judge failed to award interest on past general damages.' 'Whether the amount of interest awarded on past Griffiths v Kerkemeyer damages was the result of a slip in calculation.' 'Whether any interest was payable on past Griffiths v Kerkemeyer damages.']
Ratio Decidendi
The trial judge's award of $13,950 interest on past Griffiths v Kerkemeyer damages was a slip because it represented 6.2 per cent of $225,000 for one year when the relevant period was 10 years. The trial judge had assessed past voluntary services as accruing over the 10 year period using a rough weekly amount, thereby taking the first approach in Marsland v Andjelic (No 2), under which interest was payable. The appeal therefore succeeded and the cross-appeal failed.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; cross-appeal dismissed.
Orders
- ['Verdict and judgment for $651,350 set aside.' 'In lieu thereof, verdict and judgment for $794,400 taking effect on 6 December 1999.' "Respondent to pay the appellant's costs of the appeal." 'Liberty to apply as to costs within seven days.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment