Cardno ITC Pty Ltd v 33 York Street Pty Ltd [2013] NSWDC 312
There was a concluded agreement between Cardno and York to abate the rent by two months amortised over the lease term due to delayed possession, supported by conduct and consideration; Cardno paid all lease payments as agreed and invoiced. The lease ended properly upon notice, so no further rent or lost profit damages were due to York after termination. York was only entitled to make good costs, less amounts already paid, requiring it to repay the balance of the bank guarantee with interest.
- Parties
- Plaintiff/cross Defendant: Cardno ITC Pty Ltd ACN 084 093 050; Defendant/cross Claimant: 33 York Street Pty Ltd ACN 104 386 889
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 25 November 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Principal Judgment at Trial
- Outcome
- Judgment for the plaintiff
- Legal Topics
- Lease, Rent Abatement, Make Good Obligations, Exclusive Possession, Consideration, Termination of Lease, Damages
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Cardno ITC Pty Ltd ACN 084 093 050
Plaintiff/cross Defendant
33 York Street Pty Ltd ACN 104 386 889
Defendant/cross Claimant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Principal Judgment at Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiff was entitled to a reduction in rent for late provision of exclusive occupation
- 2 Whether the defendant was entitled to call on the bank guarantee and claim unpaid rent and make good costs
- 3 Whether relinquishing the right to sue constituted good consideration for the rent reduction
Ratio Decidendi
There was a concluded agreement between Cardno and York to abate the rent by two months amortised over the lease term due to delayed possession, supported by conduct and consideration; Cardno paid all lease payments as agreed and invoiced. The lease ended properly upon notice, so no further rent or lost profit damages were due to York after termination. York was only entitled to make good costs, less amounts already paid, requiring it to repay the balance of the bank guarantee with interest.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the plaintiff
Orders
- Judgment for the plaintiff in the sum of $34,042.68.
- Cross-claim otherwise dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment