Khoury v Sidhu [2011] FCA 21
Leave to appeal from the interlocutory judgment is granted because the judgment raises important questions regarding the scope of the Court's discretion under relevant statutory provisions in compensatory orders for loss or damage from conduct contravening consumer protection provisions.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 January 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Appeal / Interlocutory Judgment
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal granted
- Legal Topics
- ['leave to Appeal' 'interlocutory Judgment' 'scope of Discretion Under S 87 Trade Practices Act 1974 (cth)' 'scope of Discretion Under S 12 GM ASIC Act 2001 (cth)']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal / Interlocutory Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether leave should be granted to appeal from an interlocutory judgment involving amendments to defence and the exercise of discretion under s 87 of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) and s 12GM of the ASIC Act 2001 (Cth)']
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to appeal from the interlocutory judgment is granted because the judgment raises important questions regarding the scope of the Court's discretion under relevant statutory provisions in compensatory orders for loss or damage from conduct contravening consumer protection provisions.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal granted
Orders
- ['Leave to appeal from the interlocutory judgment made on 30 November 2010 is given to the applicants pursuant to Order 52, rule 10 of the Federal Court Rules.' 'The costs of and incidental to the Notice of Motion for leave to appeal are costs in the appeal.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment