SAKHA & ANOR v SANDHURST TRUSTEES LIMITED [1999] NSWCA 258

No satisfactory explanation for the delay was provided and no appealable error in the trial judge's judgment was shown; therefore, the extension of time and leave to appeal were refused.

Jurisdiction: Australia
Judgment Date: 12 July 1999
Procedural Posture: Application for Leave to Appeal / Decision on Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal
Outcome: application to extend time refused; leave to appeal not granted
Legal Topics: ['leave to Appeal' 'extension of Time' 'detinue' 'assignment of Rent' 'appealable Error']

['civil Procedure'] ['leave to Appeal' 'extension of Time' 'detinue' 'assignment of Rent' 'appealable Error']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Procedural Posture

Application for Leave to Appeal / Decision on Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal

Legal Issues

1 ['whether there is sufficient explanation for delay in applying for leave to appeal' "whether there is an appealable error in the District Court's judgment" 'whether leave to appeal should be granted']

Ratio Decidendi

No satisfactory explanation for the delay was provided and no appealable error in the trial judge's judgment was shown; therefore, the extension of time and leave to appeal were refused.

Court Disposition

application to extend time refused; leave to appeal not granted

Orders

["claimants ordered to pay opponent's costs"]