YONAN v LACE [2001] NSWCA 232
Leave to appeal was refused because, although the legal question was not without difficulty, the former solicitor had not presently claimed the costs, the amount at stake was comparatively small, and the parties should address the underlying tripartite dispute without immediate intervention by the Court of Appeal. The summons was dismissed with costs.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 02 July 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Appeal / NSW Court of Appeal From an Order of Master Harrison Setting Aside a Costs Assessor's Decision
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['leave to Appeal' 'costs Assessment' 'party and Party Costs' "former Solicitor's Costs" 'discretionary Refusal of Leave']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal / NSW Court of Appeal From an Order of Master Harrison Setting Aside a Costs Assessor's Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether leave should be granted to appeal from an order setting aside a costs assessment concerning costs said to be due to the appellant's former solicitor." 'Whether a costs assessment may include costs of a former solicitor who has not presently issued a bill or sought payment.']
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to appeal was refused because, although the legal question was not without difficulty, the former solicitor had not presently claimed the costs, the amount at stake was comparatively small, and the parties should address the underlying tripartite dispute without immediate intervention by the Court of Appeal. The summons was dismissed with costs.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- ['The application for leave to appeal is dismissed.' 'The summons is dismissed with costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment