Sheahan (Trustee) v Scott, In the matter of Livingstone [2002] FCA 1440
The discretionary decision of the primary judge is not attended by sufficient doubt to warrant reconsideration; there is no error in principle about weighing privacy interests, and the judge's reasons showed anxious consideration of relevant matters.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 21 November 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Notice of Motion for Leave to Appeal Interlocutory Decision / Application for Leave to Appeal
- Outcome
- Application dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['leave to Appeal' 'interlocutory Decision' 'examination Summons' 'discretionary Decision' 'oppression' 'abuse of Process']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Notice of Motion for Leave to Appeal Interlocutory Decision / Application for Leave to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether leave to appeal should be granted against an interlocutory decision dismissing a motion to discharge an examination summons as oppressive or an abuse of process']
Ratio Decidendi
The discretionary decision of the primary judge is not attended by sufficient doubt to warrant reconsideration; there is no error in principle about weighing privacy interests, and the judge's reasons showed anxious consideration of relevant matters.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed with costs.
Orders
- ['The motion is dismissed.' 'The applicant on the motion is to pay the costs of the respondent to the motion.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment