LITHGOW DISTRICT HOSPITAL v MILLER [1994] NSWCA 184
The Court held, apparently, that the order is interlocutory and requires leave; accordingly, the motion for extension of time and the summons for leave are to be heard with the purported appeal.
- Parties
- Claimant: Lithgow District Hospital; Opponent: Miller
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 10 October 1994
- Procedural Posture
- Leave to Appeal Application / Interlocutory Motion
- Outcome
- Motion stood over to be heard with the summons; claimant to file summons within fourteen days; costs of today to be costs in the proceedings.
- Legal Topics
- Leave to Appeal, Interlocutory Orders, Extension of Time
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lithgow District Hospital
Claimant
Miller
Opponent
Procedural Posture
Leave to Appeal Application / Interlocutory Motion
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether leave to appeal is required from an order of the District Court Judge granting a new trial
- 2 Whether an extension of time to file a summons for leave to appeal should be granted
Ratio Decidendi
The Court held, apparently, that the order is interlocutory and requires leave; accordingly, the motion for extension of time and the summons for leave are to be heard with the purported appeal.
Court Disposition
Motion stood over to be heard with the summons; claimant to file summons within fourteen days; costs of today to be costs in the proceedings.
Orders
- That the motion stand over to be heard with the summons;
- That the claimant have fourteen days within which to file a summons, which will be filed without prejudice to the claimant's contention that leave to appeal is not required and that it has an appeal as of right;
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment