Arndell Formwork Pty Limited (in liquidation) ACN 126 558 665 v Baseline Constructions Pty Limited ABN 96 058 578 662 [2010] FCA 554

Arndell Formwork Pty Limited (in liquidation) ACN 126 558 665 v Baseline Constructions Pty Limited ABN 96 058 578 662 [2010] FCA 554

Leave was granted to Baseline to proceed with its cross-claim as it arose from the same factual matrix as the main claim, and security for costs was refused since ordering substantial security would stultify Arndell's action and the interests of creditors, and the policy underlying the Corporations Act could be subverted.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
02 June 2010
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application / Order and Reasons for Judgment on Notice of Motion
Outcome
Leave granted to Baseline to proceed with cross-claim; security for costs refused; costs of notice of motion to be costs in the cause; notice of motion otherwise dismissed.
Legal Topics
['leave to Proceed With Claim Against Company in Liquidation' 'security for Costs' 'cross Claims']
['corporations Law' 'civil Procedure'] ['leave to Proceed With Claim Against Company in Liquidation' 'security for Costs' 'cross Claims']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Interlocutory Application / Order and Reasons for Judgment on Notice of Motion

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['whether leave should be granted under s 471B Corporations Act to proceed with a cross-claim against a company in liquidation' 'whether security for costs should be ordered against the applicant company in liquidation']

Ratio Decidendi

Leave was granted to Baseline to proceed with its cross-claim as it arose from the same factual matrix as the main claim, and security for costs was refused since ordering substantial security would stultify Arndell's action and the interests of creditors, and the policy underlying the Corporations Act could be subverted.

Court Disposition

Leave granted to Baseline to proceed with cross-claim; security for costs refused; costs of notice of motion to be costs in the cause; notice of motion otherwise dismissed.

Orders

  • ['Pursuant to s 471B of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) the respondent has leave to proceed with its cross-claim filed on 10 March 2010.' 'The costs of the notice of motion filed on 8 April 2010 be costs in the cause.' 'The notice of motion filed on 8 April 2010 be otherwise dismissed.']