Lech Keller v QBE Group (Investments) Ltd [1994] IRCA 176
The applicant’s proceeding was instituted without reasonable cause, justifying a departure from the usual rule against costs and entitling the respondent to an order for costs.
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 30 January 1995
- Procedural Posture
- Termination of Employment Application for Costs / Application for Costs After Dismissal of Substantive Proceeding
- Outcome
- Application for costs granted
- Legal Topics
- ['termination of Employment' 'costs – Industrial Relations Act 1988 S 347']
['industrial Law'] ['termination of Employment' 'costs – Industrial Relations Act 1988 S 347']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Procedural Posture
Termination of Employment Application for Costs / Application for Costs After Dismissal of Substantive Proceeding
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the applicant should be ordered to pay the respondent’s costs under Section 347 of the Industrial Relations Act 1988']
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant’s proceeding was instituted without reasonable cause, justifying a departure from the usual rule against costs and entitling the respondent to an order for costs.
Court Disposition
Application for costs granted
Orders
- ['The Applicant pay the costs of the Respondent as specified pursuant to Order 62 Rule 1(b).']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment