LED Builders Pty Ltd v Eagle Homes Pty Ltd [1999] FCA 1213
Eagle Homes Pty Ltd committed contempt of court by disposing of real property valued over $10,000 without providing required notice to LED Builders Pty Ltd, as ordered on 23 December 1996. The later order of 25 June 1997 did not supersede the earlier order, and the absence of contumacious intent is not sufficient to preclude a finding of contempt, though it affects penalty. Eagle Management Australia Pty Ltd and Paul Cardile were not proved to have aided or abetted the contempt to the required standard.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 03 September 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Contempt of Court Motion Within Ongoing Federal Court Proceedings / Ruling on Notice of Motion for Contempt – Post Hearing Court Orders
- Outcome
- Declaration of contempt against Eagle Homes Pty Ltd for two transfers; motion against Paul Cardile and Eagle Management Australia Pty Ltd dismissed; costs ordered against Eagle Homes Pty Ltd.
- Legal Topics
- ['contempt of Court' 'asset Preservation Orders' 'mareva Injunctions' 'enforcement of Court Orders']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Contempt of Court Motion Within Ongoing Federal Court Proceedings / Ruling on Notice of Motion for Contempt – Post Hearing Court Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether Eagle Homes Pty Ltd was in contempt of court for breaching an order restraining it from disposing of assets without notice to applicant' 'Whether later asset preservation order superseded the earlier notification order' 'Whether associated individuals or companies (Paul Cardile, Eagle Management) aided or abetted contempt']
Ratio Decidendi
Eagle Homes Pty Ltd committed contempt of court by disposing of real property valued over $10,000 without providing required notice to LED Builders Pty Ltd, as ordered on 23 December 1996. The later order of 25 June 1997 did not supersede the earlier order, and the absence of contumacious intent is not sufficient to preclude a finding of contempt, though it affects penalty. Eagle Management Australia Pty Ltd and Paul Cardile were not proved to have aided or abetted the contempt to the required standard.
Court Disposition
Declaration of contempt against Eagle Homes Pty Ltd for two transfers; motion against Paul Cardile and Eagle Management Australia Pty Ltd dismissed; costs ordered against Eagle Homes Pty Ltd.
Orders
- ["The respondent (Eagle Homes Pty Ltd) committed contempt of the order of 23 December 1996 by transferring Lot 1 DP 852183 at Hinchinbrook without giving 7 days' written notice to the applicant." "The respondent (Eagle Homes Pty Ltd) committed contempt of the order of 23 December 1996 by transferring Lot 163 DP...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment