Leda Developments Pty Ltd v Tweed Shire Council [2013] NSWADT 121

Leda Developments Pty Ltd v Tweed Shire Council [2013] NSWADT 121

Names and email addresses of individuals other than council employees constitute personal information, the disclosure of which attracts a strong public interest consideration against disclosure that, on balance, outweighs the public interest in disclosure for certain items; however, for persons whose communications are submissions on development matters, especially where such matters are ongoing and their expertise is relevant, the public interest in disclosure of their names outweighs the interest against disclosure.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
30 May 2013
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Decision on the Papers
Outcome
Affirmed in part, set aside in part
Legal Topics
['access to Government Information' 'personal Information Exemptions' 'public Interest Test' 'disclosure Under GIPA Act']
['administrative Law' 'information Law' 'privacy Law'] ['access to Government Information' 'personal Information Exemptions' 'public Interest Test' 'disclosure Under GIPA Act']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Review Application / Decision on the Papers

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Whether the deleted information constitutes 'personal information' under the GIPA Act and PPIP Act" 'Whether public interest considerations against disclosure under section 14(2) GIPA Act apply to the deleted information' 'Whether the public interest against disclosure outweighs the public interest in favour of disclosure']

Ratio Decidendi

Names and email addresses of individuals other than council employees constitute personal information, the disclosure of which attracts a strong public interest consideration against disclosure that, on balance, outweighs the public interest in disclosure for certain items; however, for persons whose communications are submissions on development matters, especially where such matters are ongoing and their expertise is relevant, the public interest in disclosure of their names outweighs the interest against disclosure.

Court Disposition

Affirmed in part, set aside in part

Orders

  • ['The decision of the respondent in regard to the deleted information in the emails that are item 1 is affirmed.' 'With the exception of the deletions that are the names and email addresses of employees of the respondent, the decision of the respondent in regard to the deleted information in the email that is item 2...