Leda Manorstead Pty Ltd v Minister for Planning [2019] NSWLEC 1342
The appeal is upheld and the modification ('MOD 9') is approved because the Court is satisfied the proposal falls within the scope of former s 75W of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 as continued by the relevant regulation. All jurisdictional prerequisites are met and the parties have reached agreement at conciliation.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 24 July 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Appeal / Final Orders After Conciliation Conference
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; modification approved
- Legal Topics
- ['modification of Development Consent' 'offsets for Endangered Ecological Communities' 'conciliation Conference' 'statutory Jurisdictional Prerequisites']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Appeal / Final Orders After Conciliation Conference
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the requested modification (MOD 9) falls within the scope of former section 75W of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979' 'Whether jurisdictional prerequisites in s 75W and relevant regulations are satisfied' 'Whether modification to concept plan approval MP06_0316 should be granted']
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal is upheld and the modification ('MOD 9') is approved because the Court is satisfied the proposal falls within the scope of former s 75W of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 as continued by the relevant regulation. All jurisdictional prerequisites are met and the parties have reached agreement at conciliation.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; modification approved
Orders
- ['The Court is satisfied that the requested modification falls within the scope of former section 75W of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, as continued in force by clause 3C of Schedule 2 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment (Savings, Transitional and Other Provisions) Regulation 2017.'...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment