REGINA v. STONES [2000] NSWCCA 341
The evidence of the key witnesses was consistent and mutually supportive; identification evidence and physical evidence (thumbprint in the stolen car) provided sufficient support; there was no real doubt as to the reliability of the verdict, and the sentence imposed was within the appropriate range for the offences considering all circumstances.
- Parties
- Crown: Regina; Appellant: Lee Stones
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 29 August 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Court of Criminal Appeal Judgment on Conviction and Sentence
- Outcome
- Appeal against conviction dismissed; leave to appeal against sentence granted; appeal against sentence dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Appeal Against Conviction, Appeal Against Sentence, Identification Evidence, Verdict Sufficiency of Evidence, Robbery, Unlawful Use of Motor Vehicle
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Crown
Lee Stones
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Court of Criminal Appeal Judgment on Conviction and Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the conviction was unsafe and unsatisfactory or not supported by the evidence
- 2 Whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive
Ratio Decidendi
The evidence of the key witnesses was consistent and mutually supportive; identification evidence and physical evidence (thumbprint in the stolen car) provided sufficient support; there was no real doubt as to the reliability of the verdict, and the sentence imposed was within the appropriate range for the offences considering all circumstances.
Court Disposition
Appeal against conviction dismissed; leave to appeal against sentence granted; appeal against sentence dismissed.
Orders
- Appeal against conviction dismissed.
- Leave to appeal against sentence granted; appeal dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment