VERSLUYS v R [2008] NSWCCA 76
On the totality of evidence, it was open to the jury to be satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that the appellant acted with intent to cause grievous bodily harm, and the trial judge's summing up and sentencing were fair; application of the standard non-parole period was within discretion given the objective seriousness.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 03 April 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
- Outcome
- Leave granted to appeal sentence; appeal against conviction and sentence dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['murder' 'appeal Against Conviction' 'appeal Against Sentence' 'non Parole Period' 'objective Seriousness']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether conviction for murder was unsafe and unsatisfactory' 'Whether evidence only supported a conviction for manslaughter' 'Whether appellant had intention to kill or cause grievous bodily harm' 'Whether trial judge gave balanced summing up' 'Assessment of objective seriousness for sentencing' 'Application of standard non-parole period']
Ratio Decidendi
On the totality of evidence, it was open to the jury to be satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that the appellant acted with intent to cause grievous bodily harm, and the trial judge's summing up and sentencing were fair; application of the standard non-parole period was within discretion given the objective seriousness.
Court Disposition
Leave granted to appeal sentence; appeal against conviction and sentence dismissed.
Orders
- ['Leave to appeal against sentence is granted.' 'Appeal against conviction and sentence is dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment