VERSLUYS v R [2008] NSWCCA 76

VERSLUYS v R [2008] NSWCCA 76

On the totality of evidence, it was open to the jury to be satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that the appellant acted with intent to cause grievous bodily harm, and the trial judge's summing up and sentencing were fair; application of the standard non-parole period was within discretion given the objective seriousness.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
03 April 2008
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
Outcome
Leave granted to appeal sentence; appeal against conviction and sentence dismissed.
Legal Topics
['murder' 'appeal Against Conviction' 'appeal Against Sentence' 'non Parole Period' 'objective Seriousness']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence

  1. 1 ['Whether conviction for murder was unsafe and unsatisfactory' 'Whether evidence only supported a conviction for manslaughter' 'Whether appellant had intention to kill or cause grievous bodily harm' 'Whether trial judge gave balanced summing up' 'Assessment of objective seriousness for sentencing' 'Application of standard non-parole period']

Ratio Decidendi

On the totality of evidence, it was open to the jury to be satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that the appellant acted with intent to cause grievous bodily harm, and the trial judge's summing up and sentencing were fair; application of the standard non-parole period was within discretion given the objective seriousness.

Court Disposition

Leave granted to appeal sentence; appeal against conviction and sentence dismissed.

Orders

  • ['Leave to appeal against sentence is granted.' 'Appeal against conviction and sentence is dismissed.']