Leeder v Ellis [1951] HCA 44

Leeder v Ellis [1951] HCA 44

The trial judge and Full Court erred in declining to make an order for maintenance for the widow based on an assumption of estate insolvency without adequate evidence; the proper approach is to make an order unless it is clear that no effective order could be made. The estate included assets likely to provide for the widow, and her claim should have been preferred; therefore the whole estate should be held on trust for her absolutely.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Procedural Posture
Appeal / High Court of Australia; Appeal From Full Supreme Court of New South Wales
Outcome
Appeal allowed with costs.
Legal Topics
["testator's Family Maintenance" 'provision for Spouse' 'discretionary Appeals' 'admission of Fresh Evidence' 'valuation of Estate Assets']
['wills and Estates' 'family Provision'] ["testator's Family Maintenance" 'provision for Spouse' 'discretionary Appeals' 'admission of Fresh Evidence' 'valuation of Estate Assets']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal / High Court of Australia; Appeal From Full Supreme Court of New South Wales

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Whether the widow was entitled to maintenance out of the estate under the Testator's Family Maintenance and Guardianship of Infants Act 1916-1938 (NSW)" 'Whether an order should be made despite uncertainty regarding estate sufficiency for effective provision' 'Approach to discretionary appeals and admission of fresh evidence on appeal']

Ratio Decidendi

The trial judge and Full Court erred in declining to make an order for maintenance for the widow based on an assumption of estate insolvency without adequate evidence; the proper approach is to make an order unless it is clear that no effective order could be made. The estate included assets likely to provide for the widow, and her claim should have been preferred; therefore the whole estate should be held on trust for her absolutely.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed with costs.

Orders

  • ['Order of Full Supreme Court set aside.' 'Order of Sugerman J. set aside except as to costs.' 'Respondent to pay costs of appeal to Supreme Court.' 'Provision be made for the appellant out of the estate by directing that in lieu of the beneficial dispositions of the will the executrix hold the whole of the real and...