Leeton and District Local Aboriginal Land Council v Attorney General of New South Wales [2021] FCA 356
The grant of an estate in fee simple over Lot 18 in 1885, and the grant of Special Lease 1926-3 under s 75 of the Crown Lands Consolidation Act 1913 (NSW) for grazing and agriculture over Lots 264 and 280, were previous exclusive possession acts that permanently extinguished any native title. Accordingly, the...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Applicant: Leeton and District Local Aboriginal Land Council; First Respondent: Attorney General of New South Wales; Second Respondent: NTSCORP Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 April 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Non Claimant Application Under the Native Title Act 1993 (cth) / Determination on the Papers
- Outcome
- Application granted. Determination made that no native title exists.
- Legal Topics
- Native Title Act 1993 (cth) Procedure, Extinguishment of Native Title, Previous Exclusive Possession Acts, Aboriginal Land Rights Act 1983 (nsw), Native Title (new South Wales) Act 1994 (nsw)
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Leeton and District Local Aboriginal Land Council
Applicant
Attorney General of New South Wales
First Respondent
NTSCORP Limited
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Non Claimant Application Under the Native Title Act 1993 (cth) / Determination on the Papers
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether native title exists over the specified land parcels
- 2 Whether the grant of estate in fee simple extinguished native title
- 3 Whether the grant of a special lease under s 75 of the Crown Lands Consolidation Act 1913 (NSW) extinguished native title
Ratio Decidendi
The grant of an estate in fee simple over Lot 18 in 1885, and the grant of Special Lease 1926-3 under s 75 of the Crown Lands Consolidation Act 1913 (NSW) for grazing and agriculture over Lots 264 and 280, were previous exclusive possession acts that permanently extinguished any native title. Accordingly, the applicant has satisfied the court that no native title exists in the relevant land, and it is appropriate to make a determination to that effect.
Court Disposition
Application granted. Determination made that no native title exists.
Orders
- The non-claimant application to be determined on the papers without a hearing pursuant to s 86G of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth).
- No native title exists in the land described as Lot 18 in DP 751682, Lot 264 in DP 751682, and Lot 280 in DP 726688.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment