Legal Services Commissioner v DRA [2018] NSWCATOD 107
The Tribunal was comfortably satisfied, applying Briginshaw, that the factual particulars were proved. The Solicitor knowingly gave police a false name, false date of birth and false answer about identification, used offensive and threatening language, resisted arrest, and identified himself as a solicitor while threatening unfounded legal action. The evidence supported that he was only moderately intoxicated and remained sufficiently cognisant to understand questions and give answers he thought suited his interests. Considered as a whole, the conduct lacked honesty and integrity, was objectively dishonest by ordinary standards of reasonable and honest people, brought the legal profession...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 July 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Application Under S 551(1) of the Legal Profession Act 2004 (nsw) Seeking Findings of Professional Misconduct / Principal Judgment on Liability; Consequential Orders to Be Determined After Further Submissions and Directions Hearing
- Outcome
- The Solicitor was found guilty of professional misconduct; consequential orders were deferred pending service of the reasons, submissions and a directions hearing.
- Legal Topics
- ['professional Misconduct' 'fit and Proper Person' 'dishonest Conduct' 'conduct Outside Legal Practice' 'offensive Language and Conduct Towards Police' 'non Appearance of Respondent' 'standard of Proof']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application Under S 551(1) of the Legal Profession Act 2004 (nsw) Seeking Findings of Professional Misconduct / Principal Judgment on Liability; Consequential Orders to Be Determined After Further Submissions and Directions Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Solicitor knowingly provided false and/or misleading details to NSW Police on 5 October 2014.' 'Whether the Solicitor engaged in unethical and inappropriate communication and conduct towards NSW Police.' 'Whether the conduct justified a finding that the Solicitor was not a fit and proper person to engage in legal practice and therefore amounted to professional misconduct under s 497(1)(b) of the Legal Profession Act 2004 (NSW).' "Whether the Tribunal should proceed in the Solicitor's absence."]
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal was comfortably satisfied, applying Briginshaw, that the factual particulars were proved. The Solicitor knowingly gave police a false name, false date of birth and false answer about identification, used offensive and threatening language, resisted arrest, and identified himself as a solicitor while threatening unfounded legal action. The evidence supported that he was only moderately intoxicated and remained sufficiently cognisant to understand questions and give answers he thought suited his interests. Considered as a whole, the conduct lacked honesty and integrity, was objectively dishonest by ordinary standards of reasonable and honest people, brought the legal profession...
Court Disposition
The Solicitor was found guilty of professional misconduct; consequential orders were deferred pending service of the reasons, submissions and a directions hearing.
Orders
- ['The Solicitor is guilty of professional misconduct.' 'Within 7 days the Registry is to send a copy of these reasons to the Solicitor at the address given under Rule 13(2)(g) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Rules.' "Within 7 days the LSC is also directed to send a copy of these reasons to the Solicitor at...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment