Instant Colour Pty Ltd (ACN 009 300 501) & Ors v Canon Australia Pty Ltd (ACN 005 002 951) & Anor [1995] FCA 870
Privilege over proof of evidence is waived when a witness uses it to refresh their memory; the amendment to pleadings for exemplary damages based on post-tortious conduct was denied as the conduct was not directly linked to the tort; similar fact evidence is admissible to demonstrate system or practice in marketing; evidence from Hughes proceeding was not admissible because parties were not the same and witnesses lacked agency or authority; expert reports grounded on available records are admissible, while factual divergence affects weight, not admissibility; reference to a letter of instruction in an expert report constitutes implied waiver of privilege; oral hearsay evidence by Mr...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 30 October 1995
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Evidentiary Interlocutory Rulings During Trial
- Outcome
- Multiple evidentiary rulings issued including grant of inspection, denial of leave to amend, admission/exclusion of evidence, and grant of access to privileged document.
- Legal Topics
- ['legal Professional Privilege' 'admissibility of Evidence' 'similar Fact Evidence' 'exemplary Damages' 'amendment of Pleadings' 'expert Evidence']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil / Evidentiary Interlocutory Rulings During Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether inspection of the second applicant's proof of evidence should be permitted after privilege waiver" 'Whether leave to amend the statement of claim to include exemplary damages for post-tortious conduct should be granted' 'Admissibility of similar fact evidence' 'Admissibility of transcript from Hughes proceeding' 'Admissibility of expert reports based on incomplete records' 'Waiver of legal professional privilege by production and reference to documents' 'Admissibility of oral evidence as an admission']
Ratio Decidendi
Privilege over proof of evidence is waived when a witness uses it to refresh their memory; the amendment to pleadings for exemplary damages based on post-tortious conduct was denied as the conduct was not directly linked to the tort; similar fact evidence is admissible to demonstrate system or practice in marketing; evidence from Hughes proceeding was not admissible because parties were not the same and witnesses lacked agency or authority; expert reports grounded on available records are admissible, while factual divergence affects weight, not admissibility; reference to a letter of instruction in an expert report constitutes implied waiver of privilege; oral hearsay evidence by Mr...
Court Disposition
Multiple evidentiary rulings issued including grant of inspection, denial of leave to amend, admission/exclusion of evidence, and grant of access to privileged document.
Orders
- ['Proof of evidence used by second applicant to refresh memory is to be produced for inspection by respondents.' 'Leave to amend statement of claim to include exemplary damages for post-tortious conduct is dismissed; costs of application to be in the cause.' 'Similar fact evidence of certain representations and...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment