Legatum Limited v Salim [2016] NSWSC 298

Legatum Limited v Salim [2016] NSWSC 298

The Court held that Legatum Limited met the four conditions necessary to enforce a foreign judgment as set out in Bhushan Steel Ltd v Severstal Export GmbH. The judgment of the Dubai International Financial Centre Court was final and binding, the parties were the same, the defendant submitted to jurisdiction by appearance and defence, and the judgment was for a fixed sum. Registration and enforcement was therefore ordered.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
18 March 2016
Procedural Posture
Registration and Enforcement of Foreign Judgment / Judgment
Outcome
Judgment for the Plaintiff. Orders made as sought for registration and enforcement of the Dubai judgment, interest, and costs.
Legal Topics
['recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments' 'requirements for Enforcement at Common Law']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Registration and Enforcement of Foreign Judgment / Judgment

  1. 1 ["Whether the Dubai International Financial Centre Court's judgment can be registered and enforced in New South Wales" 'Whether the four requirements for enforcement of a foreign judgment at common law are satisfied']

Ratio Decidendi

The Court held that Legatum Limited met the four conditions necessary to enforce a foreign judgment as set out in Bhushan Steel Ltd v Severstal Export GmbH. The judgment of the Dubai International Financial Centre Court was final and binding, the parties were the same, the defendant submitted to jurisdiction by appearance and defence, and the judgment was for a fixed sum. Registration and enforcement was therefore ordered.

Court Disposition

Judgment for the Plaintiff. Orders made as sought for registration and enforcement of the Dubai judgment, interest, and costs.

Orders

  • ['Judgment for the Plaintiff against the Defendant in the sum of $1,005,690.14 United States Dollars.' 'Interest on the sum of $690,533.00 United States Dollars at 1.82171% per annum from 19 March 2016 until paid in full.' "The Defendant is to pay the Plaintiff's costs of this proceeding, as agreed or assessed."]