LEICESTER v WALTON [1996] NSWCA 322

LEICESTER v WALTON [1996] NSWCA 322

Given the evidence of gross departure from accepted medical standards and the inadequacy of the appellant’s explanations, the period and conditions of suspension imposed by the Tribunal, save for the effective start date, were appropriate; the Tribunal’s orders were therefore confirmed except for the amendment as to commencement of suspension.

Parties
Appellant: Leicester; Respondent: Walton
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
27 May 1996
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Outcome
appeal dismissed with variation
Legal Topics
Disciplinary Proceedings, Medical Practitioner Standards, Professional Misconduct, Appeal Against Severity of Sanction
Medical Law Professional Discipline Disciplinary Proceedings Medical Practitioner Standards Professional Misconduct Appeal Against Severity of Sanction

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Leicester

Appellant

Walton

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the penalty imposed by the Medical Tribunal of New South Wales for admitted professional misconduct was excessive
  2. 2 Whether the period and terms of suspension and other Tribunal orders were appropriate in the circumstances

Ratio Decidendi

Given the evidence of gross departure from accepted medical standards and the inadequacy of the appellant’s explanations, the period and conditions of suspension imposed by the Tribunal, save for the effective start date, were appropriate; the Tribunal’s orders were therefore confirmed except for the amendment as to commencement of suspension.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed with variation

Orders

  • Order 1 of the Tribunal varied to suspend appellant from practice for six months from 27 May 1996 (replacing 'from 17 June 1995')
  • All other Tribunal orders confirmed and remain effective