Leichhardt 141 Pty Ltd v Inner West Council [2016] NSWLEC 1486
Because the parties reached an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 and the Commissioner was satisfied that the agreed decision was one the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions, the Court was required to dispose of the proceedings in accordance with that agreement by making the final orders.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 24 October 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Appeal Against Refusal of Development Application D/641/2015 for Demolition of Existing Improvements and Construction of a Residential Flat Building / Final Orders Following Conciliation Conference and Agreement Under S 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979
- Outcome
- The appeal was upheld and Development Application D/2015/641 was approved subject to conditions, with no order as to costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application Appeal' 'demolition of Existing Improvements' 'construction of a Residential Flat Building' 'conciliation Conference' 'agreement Under S 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Appeal Against Refusal of Development Application D/641/2015 for Demolition of Existing Improvements and Construction of a Residential Flat Building / Final Orders Following Conciliation Conference and Agreement Under S 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the proceedings should be disposed of in accordance with the parties' agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979." 'Whether the agreed decision was one the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions.']
Ratio Decidendi
Because the parties reached an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 and the Commissioner was satisfied that the agreed decision was one the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions, the Court was required to dispose of the proceedings in accordance with that agreement by making the final orders.
Court Disposition
The appeal was upheld and Development Application D/2015/641 was approved subject to conditions, with no order as to costs.
Orders
- ['The Applicant is granted leave to rely upon the amended plans and documentation.' 'The appeal is upheld.' 'Development Application D/2015/641 is approved subject to the conditions set out in Annexure "A".' 'No order as to cost.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment