Leigh-Mardon Pty Ltd v Titan Corporation Ltd & Ors [1996] FCA 1038
The Court considered that pursuing the proposed cross-examination concerning the alleged contradictions about the $90,000.00 remuneration issue would not assist the determination of the matter, and therefore leave to cross-examine Mr Graco was refused.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 21 November 1996
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Adjournment or Vacation of Hearing Date and Consequential Orders / Interlocutory Application
- Outcome
- Leave to cross-examine Mr Graco on his affidavit was refused.
- Legal Topics
- ['adjournment' 'vacation of Hearing Date' 'cross Examination on Affidavit' 'trial Preparation']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Adjournment or Vacation of Hearing Date and Consequential Orders / Interlocutory Application
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether leave should be granted to cross-examine Mr Graco on his affidavit in relation to alleged dissipation of Titan's assets and an amount of $90,000.00 said to relate to directors' remuneration."]
Ratio Decidendi
The Court considered that pursuing the proposed cross-examination concerning the alleged contradictions about the $90,000.00 remuneration issue would not assist the determination of the matter, and therefore leave to cross-examine Mr Graco was refused.
Court Disposition
Leave to cross-examine Mr Graco on his affidavit was refused.
Orders
- ['The Court does not give leave to cross-examine Mr Graco on his affidavit in relation to the matter.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment