Robinson v Gleeson [2003] NSWSC 674
The magistrate was entitled on the evidence to find that there was an implied warranty that the boat sold would last at least two or three weeks and that the contract was oral, not exclusively in writing. This finding did not involve error of law; nor did the magistrate err in relation to use of subsequent conduct or in denying natural justice.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 28 July 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Decision of Local Court (lcm)
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; magistrate's judgment confirmed; costs to defendant.
- Legal Topics
- ['implied Terms' 'sale of Goods' 'warranty' 'appeals From Lower Courts' 'natural Justice']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Decision of Local Court (lcm)
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the magistrate erred in finding an implied warranty that the boat would last two or three weeks' 'Whether the magistrate erred by treating the receipt as not constituting the contract' 'Whether subsequent conduct could be used to construe contract terms' 'Whether there was a denial of natural justice']
Ratio Decidendi
The magistrate was entitled on the evidence to find that there was an implied warranty that the boat sold would last at least two or three weeks and that the contract was oral, not exclusively in writing. This finding did not involve error of law; nor did the magistrate err in relation to use of subsequent conduct or in denying natural justice.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; magistrate's judgment confirmed; costs to defendant.
Orders
- ['The judgment of Miszalski LCM dated 14 August 2002 is confirmed.' 'The appeal is dismissed.' "The plaintiff is to pay the defendant's costs as agreed or assessed."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment