Wallis v. Matheson [2002] NSWCA 350
Given the lack of detailed evidence as to the sources of increase in property value and the weighting of contributions during the relationship, the Master's decision to order a 55/45 division (in favour of the appellant) was within reasonable discretion and adequately reasoned.
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 October 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- ['de Facto Relationships' 'property Rights' 'division of Property' 'relevance of Gross and Net Values' 'contributions During Relationship']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Master erred in calculation of property values at the commencement of the de facto relationship' 'Whether contributions during the de facto relationship were correctly assessed' 'Whether the division of property (55% appellant, 45% respondent) was within reasonable discretion' 'Whether the Master gave adequate reasons for the division']
Ratio Decidendi
Given the lack of detailed evidence as to the sources of increase in property value and the weighting of contributions during the relationship, the Master's decision to order a 55/45 division (in favour of the appellant) was within reasonable discretion and adequately reasoned.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs
Orders
- ['Appeal dismissed with costs']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment