Leighton Contractors Pty Limited v Australian Mutual Provident Society and Another [2001] NSWSC 390
The court deferred the determination of whether further particulars or costs orders should be made until after the plaintiff had filed its evidence, as the appropriateness of such orders would be clearer at that time.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Leighton Contractors Pty Limited; First Defendant: Australian Mutual Provident Society; Second Defendant: AMP Life Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 May 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Interlocutory Motion—directions and Particulars
- Outcome
- Motion to provide particulars stood over.
- Legal Topics
- Particulars of Claim, Directions, Summary of Variation Claims, Costs for Interlocutory Applications
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Leighton Contractors Pty Limited
Plaintiff
Australian Mutual Provident Society
First Defendant
AMP Life Limited
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interlocutory Motion—directions and Particulars
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiff should be ordered to provide further and better particulars of variation claims before serving its evidence
- 2 Whether an order for costs thrown away should be made due to plaintiff’s changes in particulars
Ratio Decidendi
The court deferred the determination of whether further particulars or costs orders should be made until after the plaintiff had filed its evidence, as the appropriateness of such orders would be clearer at that time.
Court Disposition
Motion to provide particulars stood over.
Orders
- Plaintiff to file and serve evidence by 16 August 2001.
- Mutual discovery by 11 June 2001.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment