REGINA v Lenard Clarence JONES [2002] NSWCCA 494
The material relating to the applicant's mental health condition was before the sentencing judge, who took it properly into account. The new evidence does not meet the criteria for fresh evidence. The sentencing judge did not err in approach, and the sentence, though lenient and reflective of mental health issues,...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Respondent: Regina; Applicant: Lenard Clarence Jones
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 09 December 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Severity of Sentence
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal against the severity of the sentence granted; appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Fresh Evidence, Dishonesty Offences, Mental Health in Sentencing
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Respondent
Lenard Clarence Jones
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Severity of Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether fresh evidence relating to applicant's mental health should be received on appeal
- 2 Whether the sentence was manifestly excessive in light of applicant's mental health, character, and circumstances
Ratio Decidendi
The material relating to the applicant's mental health condition was before the sentencing judge, who took it properly into account. The new evidence does not meet the criteria for fresh evidence. The sentencing judge did not err in approach, and the sentence, though lenient and reflective of mental health issues, was appropriate given the seriousness, planning, and number of offences.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal against the severity of the sentence granted; appeal dismissed.
Orders
- Leave to appeal granted
- Appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment