Inspector Christensen v Lend Lease Engineering Pty Limited (formerly Abigroup Contractors Pty Limited) [2014] NSWIRComm 42
Lend Lease, as principal contractor, failed to conduct or require a further risk assessment after the method of work changed, exposing non-employees to foreseeable risk of injury, which resulted in death and serious injuries. This failure, contrary to its own safety policies and the requirements of s 8(2) of the Occupational Health and Safety Act 2000, was causally related to the risk and constituted a serious breach—albeit not within the most severe category because of systems in place and shared culpability with subcontractors. Penalty was assessed with regard to objective and subjective factors, aggravating features (notably prior convictions and actual harm), and some mitigation for...
- Parties
- Prosecutor: Inspector Madeline Christensen; Defendant: Lend Lease Engineering Pty Limited (formerly Abigroup Contractors Pty Limited)
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 22 August 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Prosecution (occupational Health and Safety) / Sentencing Decision After Conviction
- Outcome
- Conviction and penalty (fine) imposed on the defendant.
- Legal Topics
- Risk Assessment, Duty of Care, Principal Contractor Liability, Foreseeable Risk, Criminal Responsibility of Corporations, Aggravating and Mitigating Factors, Parity in Sentencing
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Inspector Madeline Christensen
Prosecutor
Lend Lease Engineering Pty Limited (formerly Abigroup Contractors Pty Limited)
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Prosecution (occupational Health and Safety) / Sentencing Decision After Conviction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Lend Lease failed to conduct a fresh risk assessment after a change to work method, exposing workers to risk in breach of s 8(2) of the Occupational Health and Safety Act 2000
- 2 Appropriate penalty, and factors aggravating or mitigating that penalty
Ratio Decidendi
Lend Lease, as principal contractor, failed to conduct or require a further risk assessment after the method of work changed, exposing non-employees to foreseeable risk of injury, which resulted in death and serious injuries. This failure, contrary to its own safety policies and the requirements of s 8(2) of the Occupational Health and Safety Act 2000, was causally related to the risk and constituted a serious breach—albeit not within the most severe category because of systems in place and shared culpability with subcontractors. Penalty was assessed with regard to objective and subjective factors, aggravating features (notably prior convictions and actual harm), and some mitigation for...
Court Disposition
Conviction and penalty (fine) imposed on the defendant.
Orders
- In Matter Number IRC 279 of 2014, the defendant is convicted of the offence charged under s 8(2) of the Occupational Health and Safety Act 2000.
- In Matter Number IRC 279 of 2011, the defendant is fined in the sum of $200,000 with a moiety to the prosecutor.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment