Lend Lease Project Management & Construction (Australia) Pty Ltd v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (No 6) [2012] FCA 1273
The Court retains jurisdiction under both the transitional regulation and s 421 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) to dispose of and make agreed orders regarding the ongoing operation and conclusion of the interlocutory injunction. The orders are appropriate in light of the admitted conduct, ongoing settlement, and in furtherance of legislative objectives.
- Parties
- Applicant: Lend Lease Project Management & Construction (Australia) Pty Ltd; First Respondent: Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union; Fourth Respondent: Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union, Industrial Union of Employees, Queensland; Fifth Respondent: Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia; Intervener / Applicant (qud 126 of 2011): Director, Fair Work Building Industry Inspectorate; Second Respondent (qud 126 of 2011): Kane Pearson; Third Respondent (qud 126 of 2011): Scott Vink; Fourth Respondent (qud 126 of 2011): Patrick O'Doherty; Sixth Respondent (qud 126 of 2011): David Hanna; Seventh Respondent (qud 126 of 2011): Tim Jarvis; Eighth Respondent (qud 126 of 2011): Adam Olsen; Ninth Respondent (qud 126 of 2011): Beau Malone
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 November 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Civil/industrial / Disposition of Interlocutory Injunction and Orders Upon Settlement
- Outcome
- Injunctive and associated relief granted as agreed; interlocutory injunction continued until practical completion of relevant projects; undertaking and security ordered.
- Legal Topics
- Injunctive Relief, Building and Construction Industry Improvement Act 2005 (cth), Fair Work Act 2009 (cth), Interlocutory Injunctions, Security for Compliance
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lend Lease Project Management & Construction (Australia) Pty Ltd
Applicant
Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union
First Respondent
Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union, Industrial Union of Employees, Queensland
Fourth Respondent
Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia
Fifth Respondent
Director, Fair Work Building Industry Inspectorate
Intervener / Applicant (qud 126 of 2011)
Kane Pearson
Second Respondent (qud 126 of 2011)
Scott Vink
Third Respondent (qud 126 of 2011)
Patrick O'Doherty
Fourth Respondent (qud 126 of 2011)
David Hanna
Sixth Respondent (qud 126 of 2011)
Tim Jarvis
Seventh Respondent (qud 126 of 2011)
Adam Olsen
Eighth Respondent (qud 126 of 2011)
Beau Malone
Ninth Respondent (qud 126 of 2011)
Procedural Posture
Civil/industrial / Disposition of Interlocutory Injunction and Orders Upon Settlement
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Court has jurisdiction to continue and dispose of injunctions after repeal of BCII Act
- 2 Whether interlocutory injunction should be continued or disposed under agreed terms
- 3 Appropriate exercise of Court's discretion regarding injunctive relief
Ratio Decidendi
The Court retains jurisdiction under both the transitional regulation and s 421 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) to dispose of and make agreed orders regarding the ongoing operation and conclusion of the interlocutory injunction. The orders are appropriate in light of the admitted conduct, ongoing settlement, and in furtherance of legislative objectives.
Court Disposition
Injunctive and associated relief granted as agreed; interlocutory injunction continued until practical completion of relevant projects; undertaking and security ordered.
Orders
- The CFMEU is restrained from organising, engaging in, or being involved in industrial action on or in connection with the GCUH Project and the Law Courts Project until practical completion.
- Individuals undertake not to intentionally hinder or obstruct right of entry under the Fair Work Act at specified sites until practical completion.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment