Lewin v Racing NSW ABN 86281604417 [2018] NSWSC 269
On the proper construction of the Racing Appeals Tribunal Act 1983, the Thoroughbred Racing Act 1996, the regulations and the racing rules, Racing NSW's decision not to renew the licence of a person who was and had been licensed as a bookmaker, on the basis that he was not fit and proper, was a decision to disqualify him from holding and renewing the licence. It therefore fell within reg 5(2)(a), and the plaintiff had a right of appeal under s 15(1)(d) of the Racing Appeals Tribunal Act 1983.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 March 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Amended Summons Seeking Declarations Concerning a Right of Appeal From Racing Nsw's Decision Not to Reissue or Renew a Bookmaker's Licence / Final Determination of Summons
- Outcome
- Declaration made for the plaintiff; first and third defendants ordered to pay the plaintiff's costs, subject to liberty to apply for a different or special costs order.
- Legal Topics
- ['construction of Racing Appeals Tribunal Act 1983 and Regulations' 'right of Appeal to Racing Appeals Tribunal' 'validity and Operation of Regulation Limiting Appeals' "refusal to Renew Bookmaker's Licence" 'disqualification']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Amended Summons Seeking Declarations Concerning a Right of Appeal From Racing Nsw's Decision Not to Reissue or Renew a Bookmaker's Licence / Final Determination of Summons
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the plaintiff had a right of appeal under s 15(1)(d) of the Racing Appeals Tribunal Act 1983 from Racing NSW's decision not to renew his bookmaker's licence." 'Whether the phrase "in accordance with the regulations" in s 15(1) allowed regulations to disallow appeals from a refusal to renew a bookmaker\'s licence.' 'Whether reg 5 of the Racing Appeals Tribunal Regulation validly excluded such an appeal as a prescribed class of matter under s 18 of the Racing Appeals Tribunal Act 1983.' "Whether Racing NSW's refusal to renew the plaintiff's existing bookmaker's licence, based on fitness and propriety, was properly characterised as a disqualification."]
Ratio Decidendi
On the proper construction of the Racing Appeals Tribunal Act 1983, the Thoroughbred Racing Act 1996, the regulations and the racing rules, Racing NSW's decision not to renew the licence of a person who was and had been licensed as a bookmaker, on the basis that he was not fit and proper, was a decision to disqualify him from holding and renewing the licence. It therefore fell within reg 5(2)(a), and the plaintiff had a right of appeal under s 15(1)(d) of the Racing Appeals Tribunal Act 1983.
Court Disposition
Declaration made for the plaintiff; first and third defendants ordered to pay the plaintiff's costs, subject to liberty to apply for a different or special costs order.
Orders
- ['Declaration that, on the proper construction of the Racing Appeals Tribunal Act 1983 and the Racing Appeals Tribunal Regulations 2015, the plaintiff has a right to appeal under s 15(1)(d) of the Racing Appeals Tribunal Act 1983.' "The first and third defendants shall pay the plaintiff's costs of and incidental to...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment