PRICE V. PRICE AND ANOTHER 58/1962

PRICE V. PRICE AND ANOTHER 58/1962

Despite suspicious circumstances, the evidence established that Mrs. Price was of sound mind, memory, and understanding when she made the will; the dispositions were reasonable; and any incidents suggesting confusion were explainable on rational grounds. The propounders provided sufficiently cogent evidence to dispel suspicions raised by the appellant.

Parties
Appellant: Leo Price; Respondent: Thomas Price; Respondent: John Price; Deceased: Mrs. Lily Ada Price
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
21 February 1962
Procedural Posture
Probate Appeal / Appeal From a Judgment Granting Probate
Outcome
Appeal dismissed with costs
Legal Topics
Testamentary Capacity, Probate, Suspicious Circumstances in Will Making

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Leo Price

Appellant

Thomas Price

Respondent

John Price

Respondent

Mrs. Lily Ada Price

Deceased

Procedural Posture

Probate Appeal / Appeal From a Judgment Granting Probate

  1. 1 Whether Mrs. Lily Ada Price had testamentary capacity at the time she made her will on 8 July 1959
  2. 2 Whether suspicious circumstances surrounding the making of the will should prevent probate being granted

Ratio Decidendi

Despite suspicious circumstances, the evidence established that Mrs. Price was of sound mind, memory, and understanding when she made the will; the dispositions were reasonable; and any incidents suggesting confusion were explainable on rational grounds. The propounders provided sufficiently cogent evidence to dispel suspicions raised by the appellant.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed with costs

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed
  • Appellant to pay respondents' costs