Regina v Erceg [2004] NSWCCA 15
The sentence imposed by Taylor DCJ was contrary to law, and in accordance with the judgment of the majority of the Court of Appeal, the matter should be remitted to the District Court to exercise its discretion and regularise the record pursuant to s 43 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 10 February 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal not determined; matter of sentence remitted to the District Court for further consideration under s 43 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999.
- Legal Topics
- ['sentencing' 'remission to District Court' 'reopening Sentence' 'jurisdiction Under S 43 Crimes (sentencing Procedure) Act 1999']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the sentencing error made by Taylor DCJ required the District Court to re-exercise its discretion under s 43(1)(a) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999' 'Whether the Court of Criminal Appeal should determine the application for leave to appeal against sentence or remit the matter']
Ratio Decidendi
The sentence imposed by Taylor DCJ was contrary to law, and in accordance with the judgment of the majority of the Court of Appeal, the matter should be remitted to the District Court to exercise its discretion and regularise the record pursuant to s 43 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal not determined; matter of sentence remitted to the District Court for further consideration under s 43 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999.
Orders
- ['The matter of the sentence imposed on Leon Erceg be remitted to the District Court for further consideration pursuant to s 43 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999, and in accordance with the reasons for judgment of the Court of Appeal of 19 December 2003.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment