Ainsworth v Criminal Justice Commission [1992] HCA 10

Ainsworth v Criminal Justice Commission [1992] HCA 10

The Criminal Justice Commission, in publishing a report that adversely affected the appellants' business reputation, was under a duty to afford procedural fairness, which it failed to do. Although the report had no direct legal effect and prerogative writs were unavailable, the appellants were entitled to declaratory relief declaring that the requirements of procedural fairness were not observed.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Procedural Posture
Appeal / High Court Appeal From Full Court of the Supreme Court of Queensland
Outcome
Appeal allowed
Legal Topics
['procedural Fairness' 'judicial Review' 'declaratory Relief' 'natural Justice']
['administrative Law'] ['procedural Fairness' 'judicial Review' 'declaratory Relief' 'natural Justice']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal / High Court Appeal From Full Court of the Supreme Court of Queensland

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the Criminal Justice Commission was required to afford procedural fairness to the appellants in preparing and publishing an adverse report affecting their reputation' "Whether statutory or general law duties of fairness applied to the Commission's functions in these circumstances" 'What remedy (if any) is available when procedural fairness is denied in the making of such a report']

Ratio Decidendi

The Criminal Justice Commission, in publishing a report that adversely affected the appellants' business reputation, was under a duty to afford procedural fairness, which it failed to do. Although the report had no direct legal effect and prerogative writs were unavailable, the appellants were entitled to declaratory relief declaring that the requirements of procedural fairness were not observed.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed

Orders

  • ['Appeal allowed' 'Order of the Full Court of the Supreme Court of Queensland set aside' 'Declaration that, in reporting adversely to the appellants in its Report on Gaming Machine Concerns and Regulations, the respondent failed to observe the requirements of procedural fairness' 'Order nisi for writs of certiorari...