R v Henare [2003] NSWCCA 376

R v Henare [2003] NSWCCA 376

The sentencing judge erred by imposing fixed terms without setting non-parole periods for the 18 month sentences. Having regard to the applicant's circumstances and relevant sentencing principles, the preferable course was to set non-parole periods. Accordingly, both appeals were allowed and sentences varied to 18 months imprisonment with a non-parole period of 13 months and 2 weeks on each offence, to commence concurrently from 7 December 2002.

Parties
Applicant: Leonard John Henare; Respondent: Regina
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
01 December 2003
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
Appeal allowed; sentences quashed and re-sentenced
Legal Topics
Sentencing, Non Parole Periods, Fixed Term Sentences

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Leonard John Henare

Applicant

Regina

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Sentence

  1. 1 Whether the sentencing judge erred in imposing fixed term sentences without setting non-parole periods
  2. 2 Whether the sentences imposed were manifestly excessive in the absence of a non-parole period

Ratio Decidendi

The sentencing judge erred by imposing fixed terms without setting non-parole periods for the 18 month sentences. Having regard to the applicant's circumstances and relevant sentencing principles, the preferable course was to set non-parole periods. Accordingly, both appeals were allowed and sentences varied to 18 months imprisonment with a non-parole period of 13 months and 2 weeks on each offence, to commence concurrently from 7 December 2002.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; sentences quashed and re-sentenced

Orders

  • Leave to appeal granted in respect of each of the offences of break and enter with intent to steal (24 February 2002) and drive whilst disqualified (1-8 November 2002).
  • Appeal against sentence allowed; sentence quashed in each case.