Marcolongo v Chen [2011] HCA 3
The transfer of land by Lym International Pty Ltd to Mr Chen was made with intent to defraud creditors, specifically to delay or hinder Mrs Marcolongo's enforcement of her legal remedies for damages. The liberal construction of s 37A, in accordance with the legislative history and case law, permits intent to defraud to be inferred from circumstances where voluntary transfer prejudices a creditor. The findings and admissions established the requisite intent, and Mr Chen was not a purchaser in good faith without notice. The orders of the NSW Court of Appeal should be set aside and the decision of the primary judge restored.
- Parties
- Appellant: Leonilda Marcolongo; First Respondent: Yu Po Chen; Second Respondent: Lym International Pty Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 09 March 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Final Judgment by High Court of Australia
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Conveyancing, Fraudulent Conveyances, Intent to Defraud Creditors, Voluntary Alienation, Registered Transfer of Land, Conveyancing Act 1919 (nsw) S 37 a
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Leonilda Marcolongo
Appellant
Yu Po Chen
First Respondent
Lym International Pty Ltd
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Judgment by High Court of Australia
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether s 37A of the Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW) is satisfied only by actual or predominantly fraudulent intent, or can be inferred from conduct
- 2 Whether intent to defraud creditors includes delay or hindrance, and if intent may be inferred where transfer is voluntary
- 3 Whether Mr Chen was a purchaser in good faith without notice under s 37A(3)
Ratio Decidendi
The transfer of land by Lym International Pty Ltd to Mr Chen was made with intent to defraud creditors, specifically to delay or hinder Mrs Marcolongo's enforcement of her legal remedies for damages. The liberal construction of s 37A, in accordance with the legislative history and case law, permits intent to defraud to be inferred from circumstances where voluntary transfer prejudices a creditor. The findings and admissions established the requisite intent, and Mr Chen was not a purchaser in good faith without notice. The orders of the NSW Court of Appeal should be set aside and the decision of the primary judge restored.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Appeal allowed.
- Dismiss the summons filed by the second respondent seeking to file a notice of contention out of time.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment