Horvath v Heath [2018] NSWCATAP 141
There was no denial of procedural fairness as Mr Horvath received notice of the hearing and had the opportunity to appear or seek an adjournment but failed to do so without a satisfactory explanation. No leave ground under cl 12(1) of Schedule 4 of the NCAT Act was established, and no substantial miscarriage of justice was shown. Leave to appeal refused, appeal dismissed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 23 April 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Leave to Appeal Decision
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal refused; appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['procedural Fairness' 'internal Appeal' 'leave to Appeal' 'statutory Warranties']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Leave to Appeal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether there was a denial of procedural fairness when the Tribunal proceeded in the absence of Mr Horvath' 'Whether leave to appeal should be granted based on the grounds that the decision was not fair and equitable, was against the weight of evidence, or that significant new evidence was available' 'Whether a defence under s 18F of the Home Building Act 1989 had been established']
Ratio Decidendi
There was no denial of procedural fairness as Mr Horvath received notice of the hearing and had the opportunity to appear or seek an adjournment but failed to do so without a satisfactory explanation. No leave ground under cl 12(1) of Schedule 4 of the NCAT Act was established, and no substantial miscarriage of justice was shown. Leave to appeal refused, appeal dismissed.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal refused; appeal dismissed.
Orders
- ['Leave to appeal refused.' 'Appeal dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment