Green v Tweed Shire Council [2009] NSWLEC 1073
The application warrants approval as amended due to the applicants' acceptance of conditions involving noise abatement, building upgrades, and a trial period, ensuring the development aligns with rural amenity objectives and addresses community concerns.
- Parties
- Applicant: Lesley and Linda Green; Respondent: Tweed Shire Council
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 02 March 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Ex Tempore Judgment on Final Determination After Conciliation Conference
- Outcome
- appeal upheld
- Legal Topics
- Development Application, Noise Abatement, Animal Facilities, Local Environmental Plan
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lesley and Linda Green
Applicant
Tweed Shire Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Ex Tempore Judgment on Final Determination After Conciliation Conference
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the application for upgraded greyhound kennels with noise abatement measures should be approved under the Tweed Local Environmental Plan 2000
- 2 Whether the proposed development is compatible with the rural character and amenity
- 3 Whether conditions addressing noise and management are sufficient to mitigate adverse impacts
Ratio Decidendi
The application warrants approval as amended due to the applicants' acceptance of conditions involving noise abatement, building upgrades, and a trial period, ensuring the development aligns with rural amenity objectives and addresses community concerns.
Court Disposition
appeal upheld
Orders
- The Development Application Appeal DA06/1332 is upheld.
- Council is given leave to submit an updated management plan and Final Conditions by close of business 4 March 2009.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment