McKenzie v Day (No 2) [2016] NSWDC 236

McKenzie v Day (No 2) [2016] NSWDC 236

The plaintiff failed to show that the defendant owed a duty to warn or protect against the risk that a person aware of steps would nevertheless be distracted by hanging washing, and misstep. The risk was not shown to be significant, the steps and premises complied with relevant standards, and there was no evidence of previous incidents or complaints. The defendant was not negligent and the cause of injury was plaintiff's own misjudgment and failure to exercise reasonable care for her own safety.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
23 August 2016
Procedural Posture
Negligence – Damages for Personal Injury / Principal Judgment
Outcome
Judgment for the defendant against the plaintiff
Legal Topics
['personal Injury' "occupier's Liability" 'duty of Care' 'distraction Risk' 'civil Liability Act 2002 Application']
['torts' 'negligence'] ['personal Injury' "occupier's Liability" 'duty of Care' 'distraction Risk' 'civil Liability Act 2002 Application']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Negligence – Damages for Personal Injury / Principal Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the defendant, as occupier, was negligent in failing to warn or protect the plaintiff from risks associated with steps and a clothesline at her residential premises' 'Whether plaintiff exercised reasonable care for her own safety' 'Whether a warning should have been given regarding potential distraction from washing hanging on the clothesline' 'Whether design, construction, and maintenance of steps complied with standards and constituted a hazard']

Ratio Decidendi

The plaintiff failed to show that the defendant owed a duty to warn or protect against the risk that a person aware of steps would nevertheless be distracted by hanging washing, and misstep. The risk was not shown to be significant, the steps and premises complied with relevant standards, and there was no evidence of previous incidents or complaints. The defendant was not negligent and the cause of injury was plaintiff's own misjudgment and failure to exercise reasonable care for her own safety.

Court Disposition

Judgment for the defendant against the plaintiff

Orders

  • ['Verdict and judgment for the defendant against the plaintiff']