Leslie Corbett v South 32 Limited [2018] NSWDC 179
The expert report was excluded because it potentially relied on a large amount of inadmissible material of uncertain content, and no attempt was made to address this through a supplementary report. It was not appropriate to leave this issue to be resolved through cross-examination.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 15 March 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Evidentiary Ruling (admissibility of Expert Report)
- Outcome
- Expert report excluded.
- Legal Topics
- ['expert Evidence' 'admissibility' 'reliance on Inadmissible Material']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil / Evidentiary Ruling (admissibility of Expert Report)
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the expert report of Steve Williams dated 6 December 2017 should be admitted into evidence' 'Whether the report relies on inadmissible material and if that affects admissibility']
Ratio Decidendi
The expert report was excluded because it potentially relied on a large amount of inadmissible material of uncertain content, and no attempt was made to address this through a supplementary report. It was not appropriate to leave this issue to be resolved through cross-examination.
Court Disposition
Expert report excluded.
Orders
- ['The expert report of Steve Williams dated 6 December 2017 is excluded.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment