White v R [2006] NSWCCA 340

White v R [2006] NSWCCA 340

No error was demonstrated regarding sentence imposed—offence was premeditated; prior conviction for similar offence relevant; mitigating and subjective factors were considered; sentence falls within range of appropriate sentences.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
20 October 2006
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
Extension of time to file application granted; leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed.
Legal Topics
['sentencing' 'severity of Sentence' 'importation of Narcotic Goods' 'extension of Time to Appeal']
['criminal Law'] ['sentencing' 'severity of Sentence' 'importation of Narcotic Goods' 'extension of Time to Appeal']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal Against Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive' 'Whether mitigating circumstances were properly considered' 'Whether the applicant was adequately represented' 'Whether undue weight was given to personal deterrence' "Impact of applicant's age and circumstances on sentence"]

Ratio Decidendi

No error was demonstrated regarding sentence imposed—offence was premeditated; prior conviction for similar offence relevant; mitigating and subjective factors were considered; sentence falls within range of appropriate sentences.

Court Disposition

Extension of time to file application granted; leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed.

Orders

  • ['Time for filing application for leave to appeal against sentence extended to 27 February 2006' 'Leave to appeal granted but appeal dismissed']