Lesvos Pty Limited & anor v Penrith Whitewater Stadium Limited & anor [2007] NSWSC 335

Lesvos Pty Limited & anor v Penrith Whitewater Stadium Limited & anor [2007] NSWSC 335

The parties entered a binding agreement whereby the plaintiffs would operate the café at Penrith Whitewater Stadium for a term of 5 years with a 5-year option, excluding trading during the Olympic Games. The defendants' conduct in requiring the plaintiffs to vacate the premises and remove fixtures and fittings for a...

Source-derived case information.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
12 April 2007
Procedural Posture
Contract Dispute / Judgment After Trial
Outcome
Judgment for the plaintiffs against both defendants.
Legal Topics
['repudiation of Contract' 'damages Assessment' 'agency/authority' 'misrepresentation' 'commercial Tenancies']
['contract Law'] ['repudiation of Contract' 'damages Assessment' 'agency/authority' 'misrepresentation' 'commercial Tenancies']

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Contract Dispute / Judgment After Trial

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether a binding agreement existed between the parties for operation of a café at Penrith Whitewater Stadium' 'Whether the plaintiffs were wrongfully ejected from the premises and required to remove their fixtures and fittings in repudiation of contract' 'Whether damages are payable for loss of business and equipment' 'Whether statutory claims under the Trade Practices Act and Fair Trading Act were made out']

Ratio Decidendi

The parties entered a binding agreement whereby the plaintiffs would operate the café at Penrith Whitewater Stadium for a term of 5 years with a 5-year option, excluding trading during the Olympic Games. The defendants' conduct in requiring the plaintiffs to vacate the premises and remove fixtures and fittings for a period extending beyond the Olympic Games, without contractual justification, amounted to repudiation of the agreement. The plaintiffs were entitled to accept that repudiation and claim damages assessed as the value of the lost business and loss on fixtures and fittings. Claims based on the Trade Practices Act and Fair Trading Act failed as misrepresentation or statutory...

Court Disposition

Judgment for the plaintiffs against both defendants.

Orders

  • ['Judgment for the plaintiffs for $488,995 (including interest).' "The defendants are ordered to pay the plaintiffs' costs of the action (excluding certain interlocutory costs)."]