LEVY V. THE QUEEN

LEVY V. THE QUEEN

The questions sought to be raised on appeal are particular to the case and do not involve any principle of law of general application. There is no special reason in the conduct of the trial or in the matters raised before the Court of Criminal Appeal or its decision to grant special leave to appeal.

Parties
Applicant: Levy; Respondent: The Queen
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
20 November 1970
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Application for Special Leave to Appeal
Outcome
Application for special leave refused.
Legal Topics
Special Leave to Appeal, Corroboration, Summation, Accomplice Evidence
Criminal Law Special Leave to Appeal Corroboration Summation Accomplice Evidence

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Levy

Applicant

The Queen

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Application for Special Leave to Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the trial judge erred in leaving certain evidence to the jury as material which they could regard as corroborative of accomplice evidence
  2. 2 Whether an inference indicative of the guilt of the accused or of his consciousness of guilt might properly be drawn from the evidence

Ratio Decidendi

The questions sought to be raised on appeal are particular to the case and do not involve any principle of law of general application. There is no special reason in the conduct of the trial or in the matters raised before the Court of Criminal Appeal or its decision to grant special leave to appeal.

Court Disposition

Application for special leave refused.

Orders

  • Application for special leave refused.