Kerr v Regina [2008] NSWCCA 44

Kerr v Regina [2008] NSWCCA 44

Given the nature and timing of each offence, there should have been accumulation rather than simple concurrency. However, taking into account all matters, no lesser sentence than imprisonment for 5 years with a non parole period of 3 years was warranted in law. The appeal was dismissed despite leave being granted.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
06 March 2008
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
Leave to appeal against sentence granted, appeal dismissed.
Legal Topics
['appeal Against Sentence' 'drug Offences' 'sentencing Principles' 'manifestly Excessive Sentence']
['criminal Law'] ['appeal Against Sentence' 'drug Offences' 'sentencing Principles' 'manifestly Excessive Sentence']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive for three serious drug offences' 'Whether concurrent sentences were appropriate given the nature and timing of the offences' 'Whether a lesser sentence was warranted under s6(3) Criminal Appeal Act 1912']

Ratio Decidendi

Given the nature and timing of each offence, there should have been accumulation rather than simple concurrency. However, taking into account all matters, no lesser sentence than imprisonment for 5 years with a non parole period of 3 years was warranted in law. The appeal was dismissed despite leave being granted.

Court Disposition

Leave to appeal against sentence granted, appeal dismissed.

Orders

  • ['Leave to appeal granted' 'Appeal dismissed']