Martin, N. v Lewis Construction Co. Pty Ltd [1986] FCA 212
The subpoenas issued on 13 May 1986 and part of those issued on 15 May 1986 are oppressive in scope and require unreasonable time and effort for compliance, including searching for documents over more than five years and from multiple locations; they are therefore to be set aside wholly or in part.
- Parties
- Prosecutor: Norman Martin; Defendant: Lewis Construction Company Pty. Ltd.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 29 May 1986
- Procedural Posture
- Application to Set Aside Subpoenas / Ruling on Motions to Set Aside Subpoenas
- Outcome
- Subpoenas issued 13 May 1986 set aside wholly; paragraphs 2 and 3 of subpoenas issued 15 May 1986 set aside; persons addressed by 15 May subpoenas must comply with paragraph 1 as varied by removing 'notes'.
- Legal Topics
- Subpoenas, Oppression, Document Production
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Norman Martin
Prosecutor
Lewis Construction Company Pty. Ltd.
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Application to Set Aside Subpoenas / Ruling on Motions to Set Aside Subpoenas
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether subpoenas issued to the Federation and its branches for the production of documents are oppressive and should be set aside in whole or in part
Ratio Decidendi
The subpoenas issued on 13 May 1986 and part of those issued on 15 May 1986 are oppressive in scope and require unreasonable time and effort for compliance, including searching for documents over more than five years and from multiple locations; they are therefore to be set aside wholly or in part.
Court Disposition
Subpoenas issued 13 May 1986 set aside wholly; paragraphs 2 and 3 of subpoenas issued 15 May 1986 set aside; persons addressed by 15 May subpoenas must comply with paragraph 1 as varied by removing 'notes'.
Orders
- Each subpoena issued 13 May 1986 is set aside wholly.
- Paragraphs 2 and 3 of the schedule to each subpoena issued 15 May 1986 are set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment