Lew's Discount Carpet Pty Limited v Browseabout Markets Pty Limited & 2 Ors [1999] NSWSC 905

Lew's Discount Carpet Pty Limited v Browseabout Markets Pty Limited & 2 Ors [1999] NSWSC 905

As the Tribunal complied with all statutory notice and rehearing requirements under the Consumer Claims Tribunal Act 1987, and the plaintiff's absence was not notified in advance nor satisfactorily explained, there was no denial of natural justice justifying intervention. The court should not set aside the Tribunal's orders or interfere with its determination.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
10 September 1999
Procedural Posture
Administrative Law / Judgment After Hearing of Summons and Notice of Motion
Outcome
Plaintiff's summons and notice of motion dismissed; costs to defendants and Minister of Fair Trading; stay of execution removed.
Legal Topics
['natural Justice' 'consumer Claims' 'procedural Fairness']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Administrative Law / Judgment After Hearing of Summons and Notice of Motion

  1. 1 ['Whether the decision of the Consumer Claims Tribunal on 4 February 1999 should be set aside for denial of natural justice' 'Whether the plaintiff was denied the opportunity to be heard due to illness' 'Whether the Tribunal complied with the legislative requirements for notice and rehearing']

Ratio Decidendi

As the Tribunal complied with all statutory notice and rehearing requirements under the Consumer Claims Tribunal Act 1987, and the plaintiff's absence was not notified in advance nor satisfactorily explained, there was no denial of natural justice justifying intervention. The court should not set aside the Tribunal's orders or interfere with its determination.

Court Disposition

Plaintiff's summons and notice of motion dismissed; costs to defendants and Minister of Fair Trading; stay of execution removed.

Orders

  • ['The Minister of Fair Trading be added as fourth defendant.' 'The notice of motion filed 18 May 1999 is dismissed.' 'The amended summons is dismissed.' "The plaintiff is to pay the defendants' costs." 'The plaintiff is to pay the costs of Minister for Fair Trading.' "The moneys held by either the Sheriff or the...