Lexington 88 v Ku-ring-gai Council [2005] NSWLEC 635
The proposed development is permissible and meets planning controls and acceptable standards for streetscape, landscaping, character, traffic, and drainage. The reduction in built-upon area should be used to increase setbacks from boundaries. With agreement on amended plans and conditions, development consent is granted.
- Parties
- Applicant: Lexington 88 Pty Ltd; Respondent: Ku-ring-gai Council
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 November 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal Against Deemed Refusal of Development Application / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; Development Application approved subject to conditions
- Legal Topics
- Development Application, Residential Flat Building, Streetscape, Landscaped Area
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lexington 88 Pty Ltd
Applicant
Ku-ring-gai Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal Against Deemed Refusal of Development Application / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Streetscape and visual impact
- 2 Landscape area including deep soil zone and tree retention
- 3 Impact on character of area
Ratio Decidendi
The proposed development is permissible and meets planning controls and acceptable standards for streetscape, landscaping, character, traffic, and drainage. The reduction in built-upon area should be used to increase setbacks from boundaries. With agreement on amended plans and conditions, development consent is granted.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; Development Application approved subject to conditions
Orders
- The appeal is upheld.
- Development Application 1270/04 to demolish all existing structures and construct a residential flat building containing 51 dwellings is approved subject to Annexure A conditions.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment